<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOTE TO OBAMA&#8217;S SCIENCE POLICY TEAM:DON&#8217;T LEAVE OUT THE SOCIAL SCIENCES!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hybridvigor.org/2008/11/17/note-to-obamas-science-policy-teamdont-leave-out-the-social-sciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/11/17/note-to-obamas-science-policy-teamdont-leave-out-the-social-sciences/</link>
	<description>Improving decisions and outcomes through collaboration and deliberation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:48:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Hybrid Vigor Institute &#124; hybridvigor.net</title>
		<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/11/17/note-to-obamas-science-policy-teamdont-leave-out-the-social-sciences/comment-page-1/#comment-12418</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hybrid Vigor Institute &#124; hybridvigor.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hybridvigor.org/2008/11/17/note-to-obamas-science-policy-teamdont-leave-out-the-social-sciences/#comment-12418</guid>
		<description>[...] But in the aftermath of market disaster lies an opportunity to develop a more appropriate model for the market for the next century. This new market system won&#8217;t be a production of the actuarial-economist mind as much as of the social-scientific community. But before we build anew, let&#8217;s take a moment to reflect on some of problems last year&#8217;s reasoning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But in the aftermath of market disaster lies an opportunity to develop a more appropriate model for the market for the next century. This new market system won&#8217;t be a production of the actuarial-economist mind as much as of the social-scientific community. But before we build anew, let&#8217;s take a moment to reflect on some of problems last year&#8217;s reasoning. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

