<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GETTING PAID FOR INTANGIBLES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hybridvigor.org/2008/03/31/getting-paid-for-intangibles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/03/31/getting-paid-for-intangibles/</link>
	<description>Improving decisions and outcomes through collaboration and deliberation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:58:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary Adams</title>
		<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/03/31/getting-paid-for-intangibles/comment-page-1/#comment-12287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hybridvigor.net/2008/03/31/getting-paid-for-intangibles/#comment-12287</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Dan. I hadn&#039;t thought that broadly but you are right--the concept of ownership in a distributed economy will have to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Dan. I hadn&#8217;t thought that broadly but you are right&#8211;the concept of ownership in a distributed economy will have to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Guglielmo</title>
		<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/03/31/getting-paid-for-intangibles/comment-page-1/#comment-12285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Guglielmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hybridvigor.net/2008/03/31/getting-paid-for-intangibles/#comment-12285</guid>
		<description>Mary, this is as interesting as it is relevant to the professional social network we are contemplating in Boston. Content is important and so is fairness. How does one go about distribution of fair ownership to those adding content without running afoul of the complex and punative SEC rules and regs??? I think the equalizer will have to be something other than ownership, such as points towards membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary, this is as interesting as it is relevant to the professional social network we are contemplating in Boston. Content is important and so is fairness. How does one go about distribution of fair ownership to those adding content without running afoul of the complex and punative SEC rules and regs??? I think the equalizer will have to be something other than ownership, such as points towards membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
