<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THIS WEEK IN TRUST: IDENTITY PILFERING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hybridvigor.org/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/</link>
	<description>Improving decisions and outcomes through collaboration and deliberation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:48:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Neuenschwander</title>
		<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/comment-page-1/#comment-10156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Neuenschwander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hybridvigor.net/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/#comment-10156</guid>
		<description>Hi Judy, thanks for reading the post. 

The word &quot;trust&quot; is of course a loaded term. I use the phrase &quot;social trust&quot; to distinguish the concept from cryptographic trust, which is largely what your company offers. 

In the physical world, social trust relies on instinctual, highly evolved ceremonies, social emotions, queues, signals, shared memory, social status, connection, and demonstrations of ability. Such things are largely missing from today&#039;s technologies. I&#039;ve written a bit about &quot;laws of relation&quot; on the Burton Group blog. I&#039;ll be talking a lot more about these issues on this blog, so stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judy, thanks for reading the post. </p>
<p>The word &#8220;trust&#8221; is of course a loaded term. I use the phrase &#8220;social trust&#8221; to distinguish the concept from cryptographic trust, which is largely what your company offers. </p>
<p>In the physical world, social trust relies on instinctual, highly evolved ceremonies, social emotions, queues, signals, shared memory, social status, connection, and demonstrations of ability. Such things are largely missing from today&#8217;s technologies. I&#8217;ve written a bit about &#8220;laws of relation&#8221; on the Burton Group blog. I&#8217;ll be talking a lot more about these issues on this blog, so stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Caruso</title>
		<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/comment-page-1/#comment-10152</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hybridvigor.net/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/#comment-10152</guid>
		<description>Yikes, Judy! Shameless plug! Aside from that, I think you have oversimplified the issue a bit in order to promote what your company does. I think online trust entails a LOT more than just verifying who is on the other end of a transaction. At least it does for me. 

I know exactly who is on the other end with Facebook, for example. It&#039;s what they&#039;re doing with the data they have that makes me not trust them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, Judy! Shameless plug! Aside from that, I think you have oversimplified the issue a bit in order to promote what your company does. I think online trust entails a LOT more than just verifying who is on the other end of a transaction. At least it does for me. </p>
<p>I know exactly who is on the other end with Facebook, for example. It&#8217;s what they&#8217;re doing with the data they have that makes me not trust them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://hybridvigor.org/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/comment-page-1/#comment-10105</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hybridvigor.net/2008/02/15/this-week-in-trust-identity-pilfering/#comment-10105</guid>
		<description>Creating trust online is not only the tagline of Comodo - but our mission. As the world&#039;s second largest certification authority, we agree that the need is not about managing id&#039;s but about how to decide who to trust online. To create this level of trust is a function of creating the means for end users to verify who is at the other end of an interaction and vice versa. We&#039;re not just talking about it -- but we are delivering it to the market. We offer lots of free tools to manage PC security, passwords and email. We provide revolutionary content verification to help end users avoid man-in-the-middle attacks. Again for free. Creating trust online is about authentication - of people, sites, content.  Creating trust online is about creating the authentication layer of the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating trust online is not only the tagline of Comodo &#8211; but our mission. As the world&#8217;s second largest certification authority, we agree that the need is not about managing id&#8217;s but about how to decide who to trust online. To create this level of trust is a function of creating the means for end users to verify who is at the other end of an interaction and vice versa. We&#8217;re not just talking about it &#8212; but we are delivering it to the market. We offer lots of free tools to manage PC security, passwords and email. We provide revolutionary content verification to help end users avoid man-in-the-middle attacks. Again for free. Creating trust online is about authentication &#8211; of people, sites, content.  Creating trust online is about creating the authentication layer of the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

